ITC LTD vs Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd

A side-by-side comparison of ITC LTD (ITC) and Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd (SIRSHADILALENTERPRISESLTD) — valuation, profitability, growth, and financial health — to help you judge which is the stronger buy today.

The verdict

On the numbers, ITC LTD leads ITC vs SIRSHADILALENTERPRISESLTD on 9 of 14 metrics (2 tied). See the breakdown below — the right pick still depends on your goals (value vs growth, risk appetite).

Valuation

How expensive each stock is relative to its earnings and book value. Lower usually means cheaper.

17.00
P/E ratio
0.00
5.01
P/B ratio
-0.61
5.14%
Dividend yield
0.00%
₹16.51
EPS
₹-17.34

Profitability

How efficiently each company turns capital and sales into profit. Higher is better.

29.30%
Return on equity
21.28%
39.00%
Return on capital
-4.00%
35.00%
EBITDA margin
1.00%
26.65%
Net margin
-1.95%

Growth

Three-year compounded growth. Faster-growing businesses can justify a higher valuation.

3.60%
Revenue CAGR (3Y)
2.57%
Profit CAGR (3Y)

Size & financial health

Scale and balance-sheet strength. Bigger revenue/profit and lower debt are generally safer.

₹3.52L Cr
Market cap
₹138 Cr
₹78,868 Cr
Revenue
₹462 Cr
₹21,018 Cr
Net profit
₹-9 Cr
0.03
Debt / equity
0.00
ITC LTD
  • + ["Company is almost debt free.", "Stock is providing a good dividend yield of 5.15%.", "Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 35.2%", "Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 74.5%"]
  • ["The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 9.87% over past five years."]
Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd
  • + ["Company is expected to give good quarter"]
  • ["Company has low interest coverage ratio.", "The company has delivered a poor sales growth of -11.6% over past five years.", "Earnings include an other income of Rs.3.13 Cr."]
ITC LTD full analysis Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd full analysis

This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Please consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.