Epigral Limited Valuation

EPIGRAL · Chemicals · Current price ₹994

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹1,704
medium confidence · 59/100
Current price
₹1,131
Upside to fair value
+50.6%
Estimate range
₹1,534 – ₹1,875
P/E ratio
12.9x
P/B ratio
1.9x
Model it yourself — Earnings Yield Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Epigral Limited's latest numbers.

Is Epigral Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Epigral Limited at ₹1,704 per share, against a market price of ₹1,131. That puts the share price about +50.6% below our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹1,584), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹2,319). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Epigral Limited spans ₹1,534 to ₹1,875. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Valuation multiples

Epigral Limited trades at a P/E of 12.9x and a P/B of 1.9x, with a dividend yield of 0.5%. Multiples are most useful compared against the company's own history and its sector peers — see the peer comparison for context.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Epigral Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence59/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹1,534 – ₹1,875

Why this method for this business

Normalized earnings and EV/EBITDA are appropriate for a cyclical specialty chemicals business, while relative PE provides a sector benchmark.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹1,58460% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹2,31910% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical business with volatile cash flows
  • Book value is not relevant for an asset-light, earnings-driven business

What was missing

  • Lack of forward EBITDA estimates
  • Limited analyst coverage
  • No clear sector re-rating history

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
2,527.2 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
572 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
4,00,00,000

computed

Sector-median P/E
36.87×

peer-median

Peers used
28

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
62.99 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
15.7×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
28%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
9.76×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Anchor correction
peer anchor 36.9x diverges 0.4x from 5yr own-history 15.7x (no size-comparable peer) — anchor blended 0.6 toward own-history → 24.2x

peer-anchor mismatch — deep own-history used instead

Term: quality
+5.4%

quality 66/100 (high, stable returns) → premium

Term: growth
+40.0%

durable ~26% CAGR (ROCE 22% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
+8.6%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+5.0%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.3) → mild premium

Term: history
-10.5%

history: market paid -35% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
707.6 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
6,908 ₹ cr

computed

Premium vs sector
+52.3%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
82%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
36.81×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Epigral Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 15 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

Understand the ratios

More on Epigral Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.