MARICO LIMITED vs SULA VINEYARDS LIMITED
A side-by-side comparison of MARICO LIMITED (MARICO) and SULA VINEYARDS LIMITED (SULA) — valuation, profitability, growth, and financial health — to help you judge which is the stronger buy today.
On the numbers, MARICO LIMITED leads MARICO vs SULA on 10 of 14 metrics. See the breakdown below — the right pick still depends on your goals (value vs growth, risk appetite).
- Valuation13
- Profitability31
- Growth20
- Size & financial health40
Each axis shows this group's split of that metric, scaled so the leader sits at the edge. Relative to each other, not an absolute score.
Valuation
SULA takes 3/4How expensive each stock is relative to its earnings and book value. Lower usually means cheaper.
Profitability
MARICO takes 3/4How efficiently each company turns capital and sales into profit. Higher is better.
Growth
MARICO takes 2/2Three-year compounded growth. Faster-growing businesses can justify a higher valuation.
Size & financial health
MARICO takes 4/4Scale and balance-sheet strength. Bigger revenue/profit and lower debt are generally safer.
- + ["Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 40.9%", "Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 65.1%"]
- − ["Stock is trading at 25.6 times its book value", "The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 11.1% over past five years."]
- + ["Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 62.0%"]
- − ["The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 7.57% over past five years.", "Promoter holding is low: 24.6%", "Company has a low return on equity of 11.2% over last 3 years.", "Company has high debtors of 156 days.", "Working capital days have increased from 67.9 days to 101 days"]
This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Please consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.