Dilip Buildcon Limited DCF Valuation

DBL · Construction · Current price ₹396.9

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹872
low confidence · 34/100
Current price
₹403
Upside to fair value
+116.2%
Estimate range
₹766 – ₹959
Cash-flow model
₹766
Discounted cash flow (2-stage) · 60% weight
5Y profit growth
+26.2%
Model it yourself — DCF Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Dilip Buildcon Limited's latest numbers.

Dilip Buildcon Limited cash-flow valuation

Our discounted cash flow (2-stage) values Dilip Buildcon Limited at ₹766 per share. Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path. It carries 60% of the weight in our published estimate of ₹872. A discounted cash flow is only as good as the cash-flow path it assumes, so the assumptions behind it are listed in full below.

Try your own assumptions

Prefer to build the discounted cash flow yourself? The DCF calculator below opens pre-filled with Dilip Buildcon Limited's reported free cash flow, net debt and share count, so you can set your own growth and discount rate.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Dilip Buildcon Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Low confidence34/100

The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.

Estimate range ₹766 – ₹959

Why this method for this business

The DCF model is appropriate for a capital-intensive construction company with a cyclical revenue stream, while EV/EBITDA and relative PE provide market-based benchmarks for valuation.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Discounted cash flow (2-stage)
₹76660% weight

Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹1,38110% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • Discounted cash flow (2-stage) is the primary model, but the deterministic baseline already uses it. Other models like P/B or P/S are not suitable for a construction company with high leverage and cyclical earnings.

What was missing

  • Lack of analyst coverage for precise forward EPS estimates
  • Limited historical data on EBITDA margins and ROE normalization

What drives it

27 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
FCF_0 (normalized)
1,094 ₹cr

fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)

Net debt
8,041 ₹cr

gross debt (cash n/a)

Sector-median P/E
21.11×

peer-median

Peers used
32

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
73.03 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
10.86×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

MacroEconomy-wide input, not company-specific.
Discount rate (r)
14.4%

COE (building-block)

Beta
1

bottom-up industry

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
Stage-1 start growth
6%

pat_cagr_5y

Fade shape
gentle

lifecycle Declining

Terminal growth (g)
4.91%

macro terminal × quality premium

Stage-1 years
5 y

lifecycle Declining horizon

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Lifecycle stage
Declining

forecast engine (L20)

Quality premium
0.982×

moat None + capital allocation

Term: quality
-8.6%

quality 38/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
+15.5%

durable ~12% CAGR (ROCE 14% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
-7.1%

capital allocation: falling ROCE / weak cash generation → discount

Term: financial_strength
+5.7%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.3) → mild premium

Term: history
-14.6%

history: market paid -49% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Path
FCFE

computed (D/E vs 0.8)

Terminal-value fraction
0.65

PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)

Premium vs sector
-10.4%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
72%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
18.91×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Dilip Buildcon Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Dilip Buildcon Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.