Garware Technical Fibres Limited Valuation

GARFIBRES · Textiles · Current price ₹765.4

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹930
medium confidence · 54/100
Current price
₹796
Upside to fair value
+16.9%
Estimate range
₹799 – ₹1,023
P/E ratio
38.3x
P/B ratio
5.7x
Model it yourself — Earnings Yield Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Garware Technical Fibres Limited's latest numbers.

Is Garware Technical Fibres Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Garware Technical Fibres Limited at ₹930 per share, against a market price of ₹796. That puts the share price about +16.9% below our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹799), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹1,597). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Garware Technical Fibres Limited spans ₹799 to ₹1,023. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Valuation multiples

Garware Technical Fibres Limited trades at a P/E of 38.3x and a P/B of 5.7x, with a dividend yield of 1.1%. Multiples are most useful compared against the company's own history and its sector peers — see the peer comparison for context.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Garware Technical Fibres Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence54/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹799 – ₹1,023

Why this method for this business

The company is a cyclical in the textiles sector, so normalized earnings and EV/EBITDA are appropriate. Relative PE is used to capture sector dynamics and peer comparisons.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹79960% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹1,59710% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical with volatile earnings
  • Book value is not relevant for an asset-light, earnings-driven business

What was missing

  • Lack of forward EPS estimates
  • Limited peer data for EV/EBITDA normalization

What drives it

24 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
1,529 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
43 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
9,91,54,135

computed

Sector-median P/E
36.09×

peer-median

Peers used
12

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
21.29 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
161.18×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
19%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
27.42×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Anchor correction
peer anchor 36.1x diverges 4.5x from 7yr own-history 161.2x (no size-comparable peer) — anchor blended 0.6 toward own-history → 111.1x

peer-anchor mismatch — deep own-history used instead

Term: quality
+7.4%

quality 70/100 (high, stable returns) → premium

Term: growth
-4.0%

weak ~6% CAGR (ROCE 24% > hurdle) → discount

Term: capital_allocation
+1.7%

capital allocation: steady → neutral

Term: financial_strength
+9.4%

financial strength: effectively debt-free → premium

Term: history
+13.5%

history: market paid +45% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
290.5 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
7,964.9 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt basis
gross (cash unavailable)

note: net debt approximated by gross debt (cash unavailable)

Premium vs sector
-32.5%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
83%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
75×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Garware Technical Fibres Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

Understand the ratios

More on Garware Technical Fibres Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.