Jamna Auto Industries Limited Intrinsic Value

JAMNAAUTO · Automobile and Auto Components · Current price ₹142.7

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹166
medium confidence · 59/100
Current price
₹135
Upside to fair value
+22.5%
Estimate range
₹149 – ₹182
Quality score
5.7 / 10
Model it yourself — Intrinsic Value Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Jamna Auto Industries Limited's latest numbers.

Is Jamna Auto Industries Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Jamna Auto Industries Limited at ₹166 per share, against a market price of ₹135. That puts the share price about +22.5% below our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹154), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹228). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Jamna Auto Industries Limited spans ₹149 to ₹182. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Margin of safety

Value investors look for a margin of safety: a discount to estimated value that absorbs being wrong. At ₹135 against an estimated value of ₹166, Jamna Auto Industries Limited trades at +22.5%, i.e. a discount to our estimate. How much margin to demand depends on how much you trust the inputs, which is what the confidence band below is for.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Jamna Auto Industries Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence59/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹149 – ₹182

Why this method for this business

The company operates in a cyclical industry, so normalized mid-cycle earnings and EV/EBITDA are appropriate. Relative PE is used to benchmark against peers.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹15460% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹22810% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical business
  • Book value is not relevant for an asset-heavy business
  • Revenue multiples are not appropriate for a cyclical business

What was missing

  • Lack of forward-looking analyst estimates
  • Limited peer data for EV/EBITDA normalization

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
2,612 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
12 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
39,96,78,973

computed

Sector-median P/E
29.72×

peer-median

Peers used
45

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
5.85 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
23.61×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
13%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
18.14×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Term: quality
+2.5%

quality 65/100 (high, stable returns) → premium (ROCE deteriorating → premium halved)

Term: growth
+40.0%

durable ~23% CAGR (ROCE 28% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
-9.8%

capital allocation: falling ROCE / weak cash generation → discount

Term: financial_strength
+6.5%

financial strength: effectively debt-free → premium

Term: history
-6.2%

history: market paid -21% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
339.6 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
6,158.6 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt basis
gross (cash unavailable)

note: net debt approximated by gross debt (cash unavailable)

Premium vs sector
+30.9%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
79%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
38.91×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Jamna Auto Industries Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Jamna Auto Industries Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.