JINDAL STEEL LIMITED Fair Value

JINDALSTEL · Metals & Mining · Current price ₹1,045.2

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹908
medium confidence · 51/100
Current price
₹1,121
Upside to fair value
-19.0%
Estimate range
₹817 – ₹999
Quality score
3.1 / 10
Model it yourself — Margin of Safety Calculator
Opens pre-filled with JINDAL STEEL LIMITED's latest numbers.

Is JINDAL STEEL LIMITED undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of JINDAL STEEL LIMITED at ₹908 per share, against a market price of ₹1,121. That puts the share price about -19.0% above our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹964), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹509). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for JINDAL STEEL LIMITED spans ₹817 to ₹999. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for JINDAL STEEL LIMITED. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence51/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹817 – ₹999

Why this method for this business

Normalized earnings and EV/EBITDA are the most appropriate models for a cyclical steel business, as they reflect mid-cycle earnings and through-cycle valuation multiples. Relative PE is used to anchor the fair multiple against sector peers.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹96460% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹50910% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical commodity business with volatile cash flows
  • Book value is irrelevant for a capital-intensive steel business
  • Revenue multiples are not reliable for a commodity business

What was missing

  • Lack of analyst dispersion data
  • Limited forward EPS estimates
  • Insufficient historical P/E data for precise multiple calibration

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
53,455 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
22,610 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
1,02,02,45,602

computed

Sector-median P/E
17.85×

peer-median

Peers used
3

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
26.65 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
16.07×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
19%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
11.91×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Term: quality
-9.9%

quality 35/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
-3.6%

weak ~2% CAGR (ROCE 10% < 12% hurdle (growth not value-accretive)) → discount

Term: capital_allocation
+15.0%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+9.1%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.2) → mild premium

Term: history
-3.0%

history: market paid -10% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
10,156.5 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
1,21,002.9 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt basis
gross (cash unavailable)

note: net debt approximated by gross debt (cash unavailable)

Premium vs sector
+6.9%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
65%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
19.09×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for JINDAL STEEL LIMITED: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on JINDAL STEEL LIMITED

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.