Juniper Hotels Limited Valuation
JUNIPER · Consumer Services · Current price ₹215.9
Is Juniper Hotels Limited undervalued?
We estimate the fair value of Juniper Hotels Limited at ₹260 per share, against a market price of ₹221. That puts the share price about +17.6% below our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.
How this fair value is calculated
This estimate comes from 3 methods: Discounted cash flow (2-stage) (₹149), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹395), Residual income (excess return on book) (₹100). These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their midpoint rather than a weighted blend, and the disagreement is part of the finding. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.
The range around this estimate
Our estimate for Juniper Hotels Limited spans ₹149 to ₹286. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.
Valuation multiples
Juniper Hotels Limited trades at a P/E of 34.0x and a P/B of 1.8x, with a dividend yield of 0.0%. Multiples are most useful compared against the company's own history and its sector peers — see the peer comparison for context.
How we got this fair value
Every number below is part of the same estimate for Juniper Hotels Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.
The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.
Estimate range ₹149 – ₹286
Why this method for this business
The hotel industry is capital-intensive and cyclical, making DCF and relative PE the most relevant models. Residual income is included for book value context, but it is less critical for a hotel business.
The models behind the number
These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their plain midpoint rather than a weighted blend. The disagreement is itself the finding.
Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path
downweighted: 165% from committee consensus (₹149)
Book value plus the present value of returns earned above the 10.6% cost of equity
- Discounted cash flow (2-stage) is the primary model for asset-light businesses, but hotels are capital-heavy and cyclical, so DCF is still valid with adjustments for leverage and terminal growth. Residual income is included for completeness but has limited relevance for a hotel business. Other models like EV/EBITDA are not used due to the lack of consistent EBITDA data and the cyclical nature of the industry.
What was missing
- Consistent EBITDA data for normalization
- Historical P/E data for relative PE model
- Detailed capital allocation and leverage data for DCF model
What drives it
31 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
- FCF_0 (normalized)
- 204 ₹cr
- Net debt
- 1,194 ₹cr
- Sector-median P/E
- 37.98×
- Peers used
- 10
- EPS (TTM)
- 7.45 ₹/share
- ROE (normalized)
- 1.6%
- Book value / share
- 129 ₹
fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)
gross debt (cash n/a)
peer-median
peer-median
computed
computed
reported
- Discount rate (r)
- 14.4%
- Beta
- 1
- Cost of equity
- 10.6%
COE (building-block)
bottom-up industry
building-block
- Stage-1 start growth
- 15.67%
- Fade shape
- hard
- Terminal growth (g)
- 5.23%
- Stage-1 years
- 12 y
pat_cagr_5y
lifecycle Hyper-Growth
macro terminal × quality premium
lifecycle Hyper-Growth horizon
- Lifecycle stage
- Hyper-Growth
- Quality premium
- 1.046×
- Term: quality
- -3.8%
- Term: growth
- +22.1%
- Term: capital_allocation
- +11.2%
- Term: financial_strength
- +5.5%
- Term: history
- +0.0%
- Term: sector_rerating
- +0.0%
- Term: rate_regime
- +1.2%
- Term: risk
- +0.0%
- Moat
- None
- Excess-return horizon
- 3 yrs
forecast engine (L20)
moat Narrow + capital allocation
quality 47/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount
durable ~30% CAGR (ROCE 6% < 12% hurdle (growth not value-accretive)) → premium
capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium
financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.4) → mild premium
history: no reliable own-history P/E → not used
sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used
rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple
risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)
computed
computed
- Path
- FCFE
- Terminal-value fraction
- 0.397
- Premium vs sector
- +39.5%
- Fair-multiple confidence
- 61%
- Fair P/E
- 53×
computed (D/E vs 0.8)
PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)
fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)
data completeness + term agreement
sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple
Who computed this
A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Juniper Hotels Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.
Estimated 15 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.
How we value stocks
We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.
Read the full fair-value methodologyUnderstand the ratios
More on Juniper Hotels Limited
DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.