Orient Cement Limited Valuation

ORIENTCEM · Construction Materials · Current price ₹113.8

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹130
medium confidence · 61/100
Current price
₹126
Upside to fair value
+3.5%
Estimate range
₹117 – ₹144
P/E ratio
6.9x
P/B ratio
1.2x
Model it yourself — Earnings Yield Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Orient Cement Limited's latest numbers.

Is Orient Cement Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Orient Cement Limited at ₹130 per share, against a market price of ₹126. That puts the share price about +3.5% below our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹125), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹159). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Orient Cement Limited spans ₹117 to ₹144. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Valuation multiples

Orient Cement Limited trades at a P/E of 6.9x and a P/B of 1.2x, with a dividend yield of 0.4%. Multiples are most useful compared against the company's own history and its sector peers — see the peer comparison for context.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Orient Cement Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence61/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹117 – ₹144

Why this method for this business

Normalized earnings and EV/EBITDA are the most appropriate models for a cyclical business like cement, which is sensitive to macroeconomic conditions and demand cycles.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹12560% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹15910% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • Relative PE is less reliable for cyclical businesses due to earnings volatility
  • DCF is not suitable for a commodity-based business with high leverage

What was missing

  • Lack of forward-looking EBITDA and EPS data for precise modeling
  • Limited peer data for EV/EBITDA normalization

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
2,793.1 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
56.3 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
20,00,00,000

computed

Sector-median P/E
23.75×

peer-median

Peers used
12

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
10.19 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
11.07×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
14%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
6.53×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Anchor correction
peer anchor 23.8x diverges 0.5x from 7yr own-history 11.1x (no size-comparable peer) — anchor blended 0.6 toward own-history → 16.1x

peer-anchor mismatch — deep own-history used instead

Term: quality
-11.0%

quality 33/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
-0.8%

~7% CAGR (ROCE 11% < 12% hurdle (growth not value-accretive)) → neutral

Term: capital_allocation
+10.9%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+7.8%

financial strength: effectively debt-free → premium

Term: history
-9.4%

history: market paid -31% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
391 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
2,553.7 ₹ cr

computed

Premium vs sector
-3.3%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
70%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
15.61×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Orient Cement Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 15 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

Understand the ratios

More on Orient Cement Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.