Patel Engineering Limited Valuation

PATELENG · Construction · Current price ₹24.82

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹37
low confidence · 45/100
Current price
₹27
Upside to fair value
+39.0%
Estimate range
₹32 – ₹40
P/E ratio
8.5x
P/B ratio
0.6x
Model it yourself — Earnings Yield Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Patel Engineering Limited's latest numbers.

Is Patel Engineering Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Patel Engineering Limited at ₹37 per share, against a market price of ₹27. That puts the share price about +39.0% below our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Discounted cash flow (2-stage) (₹32), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹67). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Patel Engineering Limited spans ₹32 to ₹40. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Valuation multiples

Patel Engineering Limited trades at a P/E of 8.5x and a P/B of 0.6x, with a dividend yield of 0.0%. Multiples are most useful compared against the company's own history and its sector peers — see the peer comparison for context.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Patel Engineering Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Low confidence45/100

The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.

Estimate range ₹32 – ₹40

Why this method for this business

The construction industry is capital-intensive and cyclically sensitive, making DCF and EV/EBITDA the most appropriate models. Relative PE is used to benchmark against peers.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Discounted cash flow (2-stage)
₹3260% weight

Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹6710% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • Discounted cash flow (2-stage) is the primary model due to its alignment with capital-intensive projects and long-term cash flow generation. EV/EBITDA is included for its relevance to capital-heavy businesses. Relative PE is used for peer comparison.

What was missing

  • Lack of detailed project-specific cash flow data
  • Limited analyst coverage for precise valuation

What drives it

27 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
FCF_0 (normalized)
284 ₹cr

fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)

Net debt
1,055.3 ₹cr

total_debt − cash

Sector-median P/E
20.96×

peer-median

Peers used
35

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
2.83 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
16.73×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

MacroEconomy-wide input, not company-specific.
Discount rate (r)
14.4%

COE (building-block)

Beta
1

bottom-up industry

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
Stage-1 start growth
4.94%

pat_cagr_5y

Fade shape
linear

lifecycle Growth

Terminal growth (g)
4.94%

macro terminal × quality premium

Stage-1 years
10 y

lifecycle Growth horizon

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Lifecycle stage
Growth

forecast engine (L20)

Quality premium
0.988×

moat None + capital allocation

Term: quality
-6.6%

quality 42/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
+3.7%

durable ~12% CAGR (ROCE 11% < 12% hurdle (growth not value-accretive)) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
+13.6%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+7.6%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.3) → mild premium

Term: history
-6.0%

history: market paid -20% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Path
FCFE

computed (D/E vs 0.8)

Terminal-value fraction
0.422

PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)

Premium vs sector
+12.7%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
76%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
23.62×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Patel Engineering Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 15 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

Understand the ratios

More on Patel Engineering Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.