Redington Limited DCF Valuation

REDINGTON · Services · Current price ₹384.9

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹400
medium confidence · 68/100
Current price
₹394
Upside to fair value
+1.6%
Estimate range
₹314 – ₹443
Cash-flow model
₹314
Residual income (excess return on book) · 30% weight
5Y profit growth
+10.3%
Model it yourself — DCF Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Redington Limited's latest numbers.

Redington Limited cash-flow valuation

Our residual income (excess return on book) values Redington Limited at ₹314 per share. Book value plus the present value of returns earned above the 10.6% cost of equity. It carries 30% of the weight in our published estimate of ₹400. A discounted cash flow is only as good as the cash-flow path it assumes, so the assumptions behind it are listed in full below.

Try your own assumptions

Prefer to build the discounted cash flow yourself? The DCF calculator below opens pre-filled with Redington Limited's reported free cash flow, net debt and share count, so you can set your own growth and discount rate.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Redington Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence68/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹314 – ₹443

Why this method for this business

Redington is an asset-light, earnings-driven business with a narrow moat, making relative P/E and residual income models the most appropriate. DCF is less suitable due to the lack of clear cash flow patterns and the company's reliance on earnings power.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹44370% weight
Residual income (excess return on book)
₹31430% weight

Book value plus the present value of returns earned above the 10.6% cost of equity

  • dcf: Inappropriate for an asset-light, earnings-driven business with volatile cash flows
  • peer-based multiples: Not applicable due to the lack of size-comparable peers

What was missing

  • Lack of size-comparable peers for relative P/E analysis
  • Limited historical data on sector multiples
  • Uncertainty in long-term growth assumptions

What drives it

21 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Sector-median P/E
22.4×

peer-median

Peers used
3

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
21.76 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
10.49×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

ROE (normalized)
22.4%

computed

Book value / share
130 ₹

reported

MacroEconomy-wide input, not company-specific.
Cost of equity
10.6%

building-block

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Anchor correction
peer anchor 22.4x diverges 0.5x from 7yr own-history 10.5x (no size-comparable peer) — anchor blended 0.6 toward own-history → 15.3x

peer-anchor mismatch — deep own-history used instead

Term: quality
+2.0%

quality 59/100 (high, stable returns) → premium

Term: growth
+20.3%

durable ~13% CAGR (ROCE 18% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
+10.3%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+7.5%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.3) → mild premium

Term: history
-9.4%

history: market paid -31% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

Moat
Narrow

computed

Excess-return horizon
10 yrs

computed

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Premium vs sector
+33.5%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
72%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
20.36×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Redington Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Redington Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.