Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited Fair Value

SCHNEIDER · Capital Goods · Current price ₹1,152.6

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹577
medium confidence · 68/100
Current price
₹1,227
Upside to fair value
-53.0%
Estimate range
₹519 – ₹634
Quality score
5.6 / 10
Model it yourself — Margin of Safety Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited's latest numbers.

Is Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited at ₹577 per share, against a market price of ₹1,227. That puts the share price about -53.0% above our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 1 method: Fair multiple (P/E) (₹577). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited spans ₹519 to ₹634. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence68/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹519 – ₹634

Why this method for this business

Schneider Electric Infrastructure is a capital-intensive business with durable cash flows and a strong moat, making DCF and EV/EBITDA appropriate. Relative PE is also valid for benchmarking against peers.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹57730% weight
Discounted cash flow (2-stage)(rejected)
₹109

implied value is <0.2× the price (likely a data error)

EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • Fair multiple (P/E) is less relevant for capital goods with high leverage and cyclical earnings
  • Book value is not a good proxy for a capital-light business
  • Normalized EPS is not reliable due to volatility in EBITDA and leverage

What was missing

  • Lack of forward EPS estimates
  • Limited analyst coverage
  • Uncertainty in macroeconomic conditions

What drives it

16 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Sector-median P/E
42.39×

peer-median

Peers used
10

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
7.69 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
95.14×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Anchor correction
peer anchor 42.4x diverges 2.2x from 5yr own-history 95.1x (no size-comparable peer) — anchor blended 0.6 toward own-history → 74.0x

peer-anchor mismatch — deep own-history used instead

Term: quality
-1.5%

quality 52/100 (about average) → neutral

Term: growth
+40.0%

durable ~19% CAGR (ROCE 12% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
+8.2%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+1.6%

financial strength: moderate leverage (D/E 0.7) → neutral

Term: history
+8.6%

history: market paid +28% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Premium vs sector
+1.3%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
86%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
75×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.