Somany Ceramics Limited Fair Value

SOMANYCERA · Consumer Durables · Current price ₹582

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹593
low confidence · 45/100
Current price
₹565
Upside to fair value
+4.9%
Estimate range
₹297 – ₹956
Quality score
3.9 / 10
Model it yourself — Margin of Safety Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Somany Ceramics Limited's latest numbers.

Is Somany Ceramics Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Somany Ceramics Limited at ₹593 per share, against a market price of ₹565. That puts the share price about +4.9% below our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Discounted cash flow (2-stage) (₹231), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹956). These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their midpoint rather than a weighted blend, and the disagreement is part of the finding. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Somany Ceramics Limited spans ₹297 to ₹956. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Somany Ceramics Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Low confidence45/100floor: no better than this

The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.

Estimate range ₹297 – ₹956

Why this method for this business

DCF and relative PE are the most appropriate models for a consumer discretionary business with stable cash flows and a clear earnings power.

The models behind the number

These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their plain midpoint rather than a weighted blend. The disagreement is itself the finding.

Discounted cash flow (2-stage)
₹231equal weight

Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹956equal weight
  • peg: Not suitable for a mature business with low growth expectations

What was missing

  • Lack of forward EPS estimates
  • Limited analyst coverage
  • Insufficient historical PE data for precise normalization

What drives it

27 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
FCF_0 (normalized)
88 ₹cr

fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)

Net debt
374 ₹cr

gross debt (cash n/a)

Sector-median P/E
40.75×

peer-median

Peers used
4

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
25.93 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
28.64×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

MacroEconomy-wide input, not company-specific.
Discount rate (r)
14.78%

COE (building-block)

Beta
1.05

bottom-up industry

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
Stage-1 start growth
5%

pat_cagr_5y

Fade shape
linear

lifecycle Mature

Terminal growth (g)
5%

macro terminal × quality premium

Stage-1 years
8 y

lifecycle Mature horizon

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Lifecycle stage
Mature

forecast engine (L20)

Quality premium
1×

moat None + capital allocation

Term: quality
-6.7%

quality 42/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
-1.2%

~8% CAGR (ROCE 12% > hurdle) → neutral

Term: capital_allocation
-0.4%

capital allocation: steady → neutral

Term: financial_strength
+6.9%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.2) → mild premium

Term: history
-8.9%

history: market paid -30% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Path
FCFE

computed (D/E vs 0.8)

Terminal-value fraction
0.491

PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)

Premium vs sector
-9.5%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
69%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
36.86×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Somany Ceramics Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 15 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Somany Ceramics Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.