TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT Fair Value

TCS · Information Technology · Current price ₹2,465

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹3,352
low confidence · 45/100
Current price
₹2,201
Upside to fair value
+52.3%
Estimate range
₹1,676 – ₹5,089
Quality score
6.1 / 10
Model it yourself — Margin of Safety Calculator
Opens pre-filled with TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT's latest numbers.

Is TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT at ₹3,352 per share, against a market price of ₹2,201. That puts the share price about +52.3% below our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Discounted cash flow (2-stage) (₹1,616), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹5,089). These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their midpoint rather than a weighted blend, and the disagreement is part of the finding. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT spans ₹1,676 to ₹5,089. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Low confidence45/100floor: no better than this

The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.

Estimate range ₹1,676 – ₹5,089

Why this method for this business

TCS is an asset-light IT services company with strong cash flows and a wide moat, making DCF and relative P/E the most appropriate valuation methods. DCF captures its durable cash generation, while relative P/E reflects its premium valuation as a market leader.

The models behind the number

These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their plain midpoint rather than a weighted blend. The disagreement is itself the finding.

Discounted cash flow (2-stage)
₹1,616equal weight

Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹5,089equal weight
  • ev_ebitda - not suitable for asset-light IT services where earnings power is more relevant than EBITDA multiples

What was missing

  • Detailed breakdown of revenue by service line and geography
  • Long-term margin sustainability in AI and cloud services
  • Competitive positioning in emerging technologies

What drives it

27 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
FCF_0 (normalized)
37,008 ₹cr

fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)

Net debt
8,095 ₹cr

total_debt − cash

Sector-median P/E
22.38×

peer-median

Peers used
6

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
137.64 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
27.83×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

MacroEconomy-wide input, not company-specific.
Discount rate (r)
13.65%

COE (building-block)

Beta
0.9

bottom-up industry

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
Stage-1 start growth
8.72%

pat_cagr_5y

Fade shape
gentle

lifecycle Cash-Cow

Terminal growth (g)
5.5%

macro terminal × quality premium

Stage-1 years
14 y

lifecycle Cash-Cow horizon

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Lifecycle stage
Cash-Cow

forecast engine (L20)

Quality premium
1.1×

moat Wide + capital allocation

Term: quality
+14.2%

quality 83/100 (high, stable returns) → premium

Term: growth
+5.9%

durable ~9% CAGR (ROCE 51% > hurdle) → premium

Term: capital_allocation
+15.0%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+9.4%

financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.1) → mild premium

Term: history
+7.3%

history: market paid +24% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Path
FCFE

computed (D/E vs 0.8)

Terminal-value fraction
0.377

PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)

Premium vs sector
+65.2%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
84%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
36.97×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (glm-4.5-air) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.