Travel Food Services Limited Fair Value
TRAVELFOOD · Consumer Services · Current price ₹1,200.1
Is Travel Food Services Limited undervalued?
We estimate the fair value of Travel Food Services Limited at ₹1,174 per share, against a market price of ₹1,254. That puts the share price about -6.3% above our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.
How this fair value is calculated
This estimate comes from 3 methods: Discounted cash flow (2-stage) (₹266), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹2,082), PEG (growth-implied P/E) (₹783). These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their midpoint rather than a weighted blend, and the disagreement is part of the finding. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.
The range around this estimate
Our estimate for Travel Food Services Limited spans ₹587 to ₹1,291. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.
How we got this fair value
Every number below is part of the same estimate for Travel Food Services Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.
The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.
Estimate range ₹587 – ₹1,291
Why this method for this business
Travel Food Services Ltd is an asset-light compounder in the leisure services sector, where earnings power and a durable moat are key. DCF, relative PE, and PEG are the most appropriate models for valuing such a business.
The models behind the number
These methods disagree materially, so the estimate is their plain midpoint rather than a weighted blend. The disagreement is itself the finding.
Intrinsic value from 2-stage discounted cash flows (primary for asset-light / normal businesses); FCFE path; downweighted: 66% from committee consensus (₹783)
downweighted: 166% from committee consensus (₹783)
- Discounted cash flow (2-stage) is the primary model, but the deterministic baseline already uses it. Other models like EV/EBITDA are not suitable for an asset-light business. A DCF is not appropriate for a cyclical business, which this is not.
What was missing
- Lack of historical P/E data for the company
- Limited analyst coverage for the company
What drives it
28 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
- Earnings growth
- 21.7% CAGR
- EPS (TTM)
- 36.14 ₹/share
- FCF_0 (normalized)
- 308 ₹cr
- Net debt
- 245 ₹cr
- Sector-median P/E
- 34.72×
- Peers used
- 5
computed
computed
fcf_norm (median ≤5y positive)
gross debt (cash n/a)
peer-median
peer-median
- Discount rate (r)
- 14.78%
- Beta
- 1.05
COE (building-block)
bottom-up industry
- Stage-1 start growth
- 5.5%
- Fade shape
- hard
- Terminal growth (g)
- 5.5%
- Stage-1 years
- 14 y
pat_cagr_5y
lifecycle Hyper-Growth
macro terminal × quality premium
lifecycle Hyper-Growth horizon
- Lifecycle stage
- Hyper-Growth
- Quality premium
- 1.1×
- Term: quality
- +1.1%
- Term: growth
- +40.0%
- Term: capital_allocation
- +9.4%
- Term: financial_strength
- +5.9%
- Term: history
- +0.0%
- Term: sector_rerating
- +0.0%
- Term: rate_regime
- +1.2%
- Term: risk
- +0.0%
forecast engine (L20)
moat Wide + capital allocation
quality 57/100 (about average) → neutral
durable ~29% CAGR (ROCE 38% > hurdle) → premium
capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium
financial strength: low leverage (D/E 0.2) → mild premium
history: no reliable own-history P/E → not used
sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used
rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple
risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)
- Growth-implied P/E
- 21.7×
- Path
- FCFE
- Terminal-value fraction
- 0.307
- Premium vs sector
- +65.9%
- Fair-multiple confidence
- 59%
- Fair P/E
- 57.61×
min(growth, 30)
computed (D/E vs 0.8)
PV_TV / (PV_1+PV_TV)
fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)
data completeness + term agreement
sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple
Who computed this
A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Travel Food Services Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.
Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.
How we value stocks
We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.
Read the full fair-value methodologyMore on Travel Food Services Limited
DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.