UPL LIMITED Fair Value

UPL · Chemicals · Current price ₹534.65

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹586
low confidence · 40/100
Current price
₹573
Upside to fair value
+2.3%
Estimate range
₹527 – ₹644
Quality score
3.6 / 10
Model it yourself — Margin of Safety Calculator
Opens pre-filled with UPL LIMITED's latest numbers.

Is UPL LIMITED undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of UPL LIMITED at ₹586 per share, against a market price of ₹573. That puts the share price about +2.3% below our estimate, at low confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹632), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹350). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for UPL LIMITED spans ₹527 to ₹644. That range is wide, which is the honest signal here: read the range rather than the single number. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for UPL LIMITED. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Low confidence40/100

The inputs are thin or the models disagree sharply. This is our least reliable kind of estimate, so read the range rather than the single number.

Estimate range ₹527 – ₹644

Why this method for this business

UPL is a cyclical commodity player with a narrow moat, so normalized earnings and EV/EBITDA are most appropriate. Relative PE is used for sector comparison.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹63260% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹35010% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical commodity business
  • Book value is not relevant for an asset-heavy business
  • Revenue multiples are not applicable for a cyclical business

What was missing

  • Lack of analyst dispersion data
  • Limited forward EPS estimates
  • Insufficient historical P/E data for precise normalization

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
51,839 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
23,576 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
84,40,86,022

computed

Sector-median P/E
25.82×

peer-median

Peers used
34

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
23.95 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
18.73×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
18%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
8.24×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Term: quality
-15.0%

quality 25/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
-23.3%

weak ~-1% CAGR (ROCE 13% > hurdle) → discount

Term: capital_allocation
-11.2%

capital allocation: falling ROCE / weak cash generation → discount

Term: financial_strength
+5.4%

financial strength: effectively debt-free → premium

Term: history
-8.2%

history: market paid -27% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
9,331 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
76,910 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt basis
gross (cash unavailable)

note: net debt approximated by gross debt (cash unavailable)

Premium vs sector
-43.4%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
83%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
14.62×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for UPL LIMITED: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on UPL LIMITED

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.