Steel Authority of India Limited Intrinsic Value

SAIL · Metals & Mining · Current price ₹170.95

Full stock page
DocStoX fair value
₹189
medium confidence · 57/100
Current price
₹179
Upside to fair value
+5.6%
Estimate range
₹170 – ₹208
Quality score
4.1 / 10
Model it yourself — Intrinsic Value Calculator
Opens pre-filled with Steel Authority of India Limited's latest numbers.

Is Steel Authority of India Limited undervalued?

We estimate the fair value of Steel Authority of India Limited at ₹189 per share, against a market price of ₹179. That puts the share price about +5.6% below our estimate, at medium confidence. This is our view of what the business is worth, not a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

How this fair value is calculated

This estimate comes from 2 methods: Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA) (₹195), Fair multiple (P/E) (₹149). Each is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company. The full working, including the assumptions and what data was missing, is set out below.

The range around this estimate

Our estimate for Steel Authority of India Limited spans ₹170 to ₹208. A margin of safety means buying meaningfully below the estimate: the wider the range, the more room the assumptions leave for error.

Margin of safety

Value investors look for a margin of safety: a discount to estimated value that absorbs being wrong. At ₹179 against an estimated value of ₹189, Steel Authority of India Limited trades at +5.6%, i.e. a discount to our estimate. How much margin to demand depends on how much you trust the inputs, which is what the confidence band below is for.

How we got this fair value

Every number below is part of the same estimate for Steel Authority of India Limited. Nothing here is a target price or a forecast of where the share price will go.

Medium confidence57/100

Workable, with real gaps. Weigh it alongside your own view rather than on its own.

Estimate range ₹170 – ₹208

Why this method for this business

SAIL is a cyclical commodity business, so normalized mid-cycle earnings and EV/EBITDA are the most relevant models. Relative PE provides a sector benchmark.

The models behind the number

Each method is weighted by how well its inputs held up for this company.

Normalized earnings (mid-cycle EV/EBITDA)
₹19560% weight

Cyclical valued off mid-cycle earnings and a through-cycle EV/EBITDA (§6.6)

Fair multiple (P/E)
₹14910% weight
EV / EBITDA(not enough data)

required inputs missing

  • DCF is not suitable for a cyclical commodity business
  • Book-value residual income is not applicable for an asset-heavy business

What was missing

  • Lack of forward analyst estimates for EV/EBITDA
  • Limited historical data on sector multiples

What drives it

23 inputs, grouped by how strong each claim is
ReportedRead from filings or market data. Verifiable, not our opinion.
Revenue (TTM)
1,10,811 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt
31,928 ₹ cr

computed

Shares outstanding
4,12,89,91,060

computed

Sector-median P/E
15.95×

peer-median

Peers used
3

peer-median

EPS (TTM)
10.34 ₹/share

computed

Own-history median P/E
15.69×

reconstructed (one feature, dampened — not a cap)

AssumptionA forward input the model chose. Reasonable people can disagree here.
EBITDA margin (cycle median)
11%

computed (≤5y median)

Through-cycle EV/EBITDA
9.22×

own-history (median of 5y)

JudgementOur read of the evidence, not a measurement.
Term: quality
-15.2%

quality 25/100 (weak/erratic returns) → discount

Term: growth
-3.2%

weak ~3% CAGR (ROCE 8% < 12% hurdle (growth not value-accretive)) → discount

Term: capital_allocation
+6.8%

capital allocation: rising ROCE funded by strong FCF → premium

Term: financial_strength
+2.0%

financial strength: moderate leverage (D/E 0.5) → neutral

Term: history
-0.5%

history: market paid -2% vs sector, dampened ×0.3 (one feature, not the anchor)

Term: sector_rerating
+0.0%

sector re-rating: no sector-norm history → not used

Term: rate_regime
+1.2%

rates: risk-free 6.9% below ~7.1% normal → higher multiple

Term: risk
+0.0%

risk: no analyst-dispersion signal available → neutral (lowers confidence, not PE)

DerivedFalls out of the inputs above: a model output, not an independent input.
Mid-cycle EBITDA
12,189.2 ₹ cr

computed

Enterprise value
1,12,366.2 ₹ cr

computed

Net debt basis
gross (cash unavailable)

note: net debt approximated by gross debt (cash unavailable)

Premium vs sector
-9.8%

fundamentals + macro (not capped at own history)

Fair-multiple confidence
67%

data completeness + term agreement

Fair P/E
14.38×

sector median × ∏(1+term) — Dynamic Fair Multiple

Who computed this

A language model (qwen3:8b) selects the valuation method and the judgement inputs for Steel Authority of India Limited: which models suit the business, the moat, the growth and margin assumptions. It does not produce the number. The fair value itself is computed in Python by a deterministic engine (version 2026.08.1) from those inputs, so the same inputs always give the same result and every figure above can be traced to a source.

Estimated 14 Sept 2026. Re-run as new financials and news arrive.

How we value stocks

We estimate what a business is worth from its own economics: cash flows, returns on capital, and a multiple justified by its quality, rather than from where the share price has been. A fair value estimate is a view, not a verdict, and it is only as good as the inputs listed above.

Read the full fair-value methodology

More on Steel Authority of India Limited

DocStoX estimates are computed from reported financials, for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered advisor before investing.